Ra, Rz and Rt: surface roughness explained

What the three most used roughness values measure, how they are read from one profile, and how to get a drawing callout such as Ra 0.8 µm in turning.

Ra, Rz and Rt are all calculated from the same measured profile, but they answer different questions. Ra is an average and hides single scratches, Rz averages five peak-to-valley heights, and Rt is the total height of the roughness profile within the evaluation length. This guide shows how each is defined, how they relate, which mistakes cause rejected parts, and how to estimate the finish of a turned surface before cutting.

TorqueMath · checked against the standards listed below and the calculator’s test cases · Updated

One profile, three values

A stylus instrument traces the surface along a line and records the height z of the profile. The waviness is filtered out with a cut-off wavelength λc, and what is left is the roughness profile. Under ISO 4287:1997 and ISO 4288:1996 the usual evaluation length is five sampling lengths lr (each one cut-off long) unless something else is specified. The ISO 21920 series partly uses different evaluation and specification rules; the definitions and tables below refer explicitly to the older system, which most drawings and instruments in use still follow.

Which standard? ISO 21920 (2021) has replaced ISO 4287, ISO 4288 and ISO 1302 and changes some defaults and drawing symbols. Check which standard your drawing and your instrument refer to.

- - mean lineRz1sampling length lrRz2sampling length lrRz3sampling length lrRz4sampling length lrRz5sampling length lrRtevaluation length ln = 5 × lrRa = mean of the shaded deviations |z| from the mean lineRz = (Rz1 + Rz2 + Rz3 + Rz4 + Rz5) / 5 · Rt = highest peak to deepest valley over ln
Figure 1. The roughness profile over five sampling lengths. Ra is the mean of the shaded deviations from the mean line, each Rzi is the peak-to-valley height inside one sampling length, Rz is their mean and Rt is the highest peak to the deepest valley over the whole evaluation length.
Ra = (1/ln) · ∫ |z(x)| dx

Ra (arithmetic mean deviation): the average distance of the profile from its mean line, ignoring the sign.

Rz = (Rz1 + Rz2 + Rz3 + Rz4 + Rz5) / 5

Rz (maximum height of profile, averaged): in each sampling length take highest peak + deepest valley, then average the five values.

Rt = max peak + max valley over ln

Rt (total height of profile): the highest peak plus the deepest valley within the specified evaluation length, so Rt ≥ Rz always. It is not a maximum over the whole workpiece.

How the three values react

Because Ra is an average, a surface with one deep scratch and a surface without it can have similar Ra values, depending on the width and depth of the scratch. Rz picks the scratch up in one of its five sampling lengths, and Rt reports it in full. That is why sealing faces and running surfaces are often specified with Rz or Rt (or both), and general machined surfaces with Ra.

Ra, Rz and Rt compared
ValueWhat it isSensitive to single scratches?Typical use on drawings
Raaverage deviation from the mean linehardlygeneral machined surfaces, US drawings (µin)
Rzmean of 5 single peak-to-valley heightspartly (1 of 5)European drawings, fits, sealing surfaces
Rtlargest peak-to-valley over lnfullysealing faces, critical running surfaces

There is no exact conversion from Ra to Rz. The ratio depends on the shape of the profile. For turned surfaces Rz is typically about 4 to 7 × Ra; for ground or honed surfaces the ratio is different. Use a conversion only as a rough guide, and measure the parameter that the drawing asks for.

Cut-off and evaluation length

The same surface gives different values with a different cut-off λc, so the cut-off is part of the result. For non-periodic profiles (ground, lapped, eroded) ISO 4288 chooses λc from the expected Ra; for periodic profiles such as turned surfaces it is chosen from the feed-mark spacing (RSm). Unless the drawing says otherwise, the evaluation length is 5 × λc.

Historical cut-off selection for non-periodic profiles (ISO 4288:1996)
Expected Ra (µm)Cut-off λc (mm)Evaluation length ln (mm)
0.006 < Ra ≤ 0.020.080.40
0.02 < Ra ≤ 0.100.251.25
0.10 < Ra ≤ 2.000.804.00
2.00 < Ra ≤ 10.02.5012.50
10.0 < Ra ≤ 80.08.0040.00

Periodic profiles use other selection rules; ISO 21920-3 uses a changed specification system.

Old names: Rz DIN, Rz ISO, Rmax and “Rautiefe”

Older drawings and catalogues use names that look the same but are not:

Predicting the finish in turning

In turning, the nose radius r of the insert leaves a row of arcs, one per revolution, spaced by the feed f. For an idealised round nose this gives a geometric cusp height that grows with the square of the feed and falls with the nose radius:

rinsert nose (one revolution later)f feed per revolutionhthEach revolution the nose radius leaves an arc; the arcs meet in peaks.hth ≈ f² / (8·r) · Ra,geo ≈ f² / (31.2·r)not to scale: height exaggerated
Figure 2. Feed marks of an idealised round insert nose. Halving the feed f cuts the geometric cusp height to a quarter; doubling the nose radius r halves it.
hth ≈ f² / (8·r) Ra,geo ≈ f² / (31.2·r)

f in mm/rev, r in mm; multiply by 1000 for µm. These are geometric values for an ideal circular cutting edge, not roughness values measured to ISO: filtering, the real edge shape, vibration and material deformation are not included, so measured values can differ considerably.

Historical roughness grades N4–N10 from older ISO 1302 editions, with typical, non-binding processes
Ra (µm)Ra (µin)N gradeTypical process
0.28N4fine grinding, honing, lapping
0.416N5grinding, fine turning with wiper inserts
0.832N6finish turning, grinding: bearing seats
1.663N7finish turning, finish milling
3.2125N8normal turning and milling
6.3250N9rough turning, sawing
12.5500N10roughing, flame cutting

Process ranges are typical, not limits; a good machine and sharp tool can do better, a worn tool worse.

Worked example: turning a shaft seat to Ra 0.8 µm with a CNMG 120408 insert

  1. The insert code ends in 08, so the nose radius is r = 0.8 mm. Start with a typical finishing feed f = 0.20 mm/rev.
  2. Geometric cusp height: hth = 0.20² / (8 × 0.8) = 0.00625 mm = 6.25 µm.
  3. Geometric Ra: 0.20² / (31.2 × 0.8) = 0.0016 mm = 1.60 µm (63 µin). That misses the Ra 0.8 callout.
  4. Feed for the target in the simplified geometric model: f = √(31.2 · r · Ra) = √(31.2 × 0.8 × 0.0008) = 0.141 mm/rev, which gives Ra,geo ≈ 0.8 µm.
  5. The measured Ra can differ considerably depending on material, tool geometry, wear, vibration and measuring conditions, so this feed is only a starting value. A wiper insert can allow higher feeds with a good finish; the insert maker's data and a measurement on a test part decide.

Start at about 0.14 mm/rev with an R0.8 insert (geometric model), cut a test part and measure it with the cut-off the drawing asks for. Adjust the feed, or use a wiper insert per the maker's data, from that measurement.

Common mistakes

Sources and standards

Work out the feed for your insertEnter your nose radius and feed, or the Ra from the drawing, and get the theoretical and expected finish, the feed you need and the N grade.
Open the calculator →

FAQ

What is the difference between Ra and Rz?

Ra is the arithmetic average of the profile's deviations from the mean line. Rz is the average of five single peak-to-valley heights, one per sampling length. Ra is calm and hides single scratches, Rz shows the extremes. On turned surfaces Rz is usually about 4 to 7 times Ra, but there is no exact conversion.

Is Rt the same as Rz?

No. Rt is the largest peak-to-valley height over the whole evaluation length, Rz is the mean of the five single heights. Rt is always at least as large as Rz. A single deep scratch shows up in Rt in full, but in Rz it is averaged with four other sampling lengths.

How do I convert Ra to Rz?

Only approximately. For turned surfaces Rz ≈ 4 to 7 × Ra is a common rule of thumb, so Ra 1.6 µm corresponds roughly to Rz 6.3 to 10 µm. For a binding requirement measure Rz itself.

Which cut-off should I use?

The one on the drawing. If none is given, ISO 4288 picks it from the expected Ra for non-periodic profiles (0.8 mm for Ra 0.1 to 2 µm) and from the feed-mark spacing for periodic profiles such as turned surfaces. The evaluation length is normally five cut-offs.

What feed gives Ra 1.6 with a 0.8 mm nose radius?

In the simplified geometric model f = √(31.2 × 0.8 × 0.0016) ≈ 0.20 mm/rev. Treat it as a starting value and check the finish on a test part, or work it out for your insert in the surface roughness calculator.